Sun Tzu vs Machiavelli
8 min read
The Art of War, traditionally by Sun Tzu (Sun Wu, said to have lived around 544 to 496 BCE), is a short Chinese guide for generals: win by planning, knowledge and deception, ideally without fighting. The Prince (written 1513) by Niccolò Machiavelli (1469 to 1527) is a guide for rulers on gaining and keeping a state, famous for saying it is safer to be feared than loved. They overlap on deception and realism, but one is about war, the other about power.
Who were Sun Tzu and Machiavelli?
Sun Tzu, or Sunzi, “Master Sun”, is the traditional author of The Art of War (Sunzi bingfa), thirteen short chapters on strategy. Almost all we know of the man comes from one biography written about 91 BCE by the historian Sima Qian in the Records of the Grand Historian (chapter 65). It says Sun Wu came from the state of Qi, impressed King Helü of Wu, and helped Wu defeat the larger state of Chu around 506 BCE. Many scholars think the book as we have it was put together later, in the Warring States period (5th to 4th century BCE), and some doubt the man existed as described. Our article did Sun Tzu exist sets out the evidence. A copy on bamboo strips found in a Han dynasty tomb at Yinqueshan in 1972 shows the text was in circulation by the 2nd century BCE.
Niccolò Machiavelli was born in Florence on 3 May 1469. From 1498 to 1512 he served the Florentine Republic as secretary of the Second Chancery, travelling as an envoy to the French court, the emperor and Cesare Borgia. When the Medici returned to power in 1512 he lost his post; in 1513 he was arrested on suspicion of conspiracy and tortured, then released. On his farm at Sant'Andrea in Percussina he wrote The Prince in 1513 and the Discourses on Livy over the next years. The Prince was published only in 1532, five years after his death on 21 June 1527.
The Art of War vs The Prince: comparison table
| The Art of War (Sun Tzu) | The Prince (Machiavelli) | |
|---|---|---|
| Written | Traditionally c. 500 BCE; probably compiled 5th to 4th century BCE | 1513; published 1532 |
| Author | Traditional attribution; authorship and dates debated | Certain; we have his letters describing the writing |
| Length | 13 short chapters, about 6,000 Chinese characters | 26 chapters plus a dedication |
| Written for | Generals and the rulers who employ them | A new prince; dedicated to Lorenzo de' Medici |
| Main subject | Winning wars at least cost | Gaining, keeping and strengthening a state |
| On fighting | Best to win without battle; long wars ruin states | A prince should study war above all; use your own troops, never mercenaries |
| On deception | “All warfare is based on deception” | A prince must be both fox and lion (chapter 18) |
| Image for chance | Water: armies should adapt like water to the ground | Fortune: a violent river that can be held back by dikes built in calm times |
| First European translation | French, by the Jesuit Joseph-Marie Amiot, 1772 | Written in Italian; Latin and other translations from the 1500s |
Did Machiavelli read Sun Tzu?
No. The Art of War was unknown in Europe until Amiot's French version appeared in Paris in 1772, 245 years after Machiavelli died. The first full English translation by Lionel Giles came in 1910. Any likeness between the two books comes from two careful observers of war and politics reaching similar conclusions, not from influence.
To add to the confusion, Machiavelli also wrote a book called The Art of War (Dell'arte della guerra, 1521). It is a dialogue about armies, drill and the citizen militia, and it was the only one of his major political works printed in his lifetime. When someone says “Machiavelli's Art of War”, check which book they mean.
Where Sun Tzu and Machiavelli agree
Both write about how things are, not how they ought to be, and both expect leaders to use deception.
“All warfare is based on deception.”
Machiavelli says in chapter 18 of The Prince that a ruler must know how to act like a beast as well as a man: the lion, which can frighten wolves, and the fox, which can spot traps. A wise prince, he says, need not keep his word when keeping it works against him.
Both value knowledge and preparation. Sun Tzu says that if you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear a hundred battles (chapter 3), and gives a whole chapter to spies (chapter 13). Machiavelli's chapter 14 says a prince should study war in peacetime, through exercise and through reading the histories of great commanders.
Both use water. Sun Tzu compares a well-handled army to water, which has no constant shape and follows the ground (chapter 6). Machiavelli compares fortune to a flooding river and says prudent men build dikes and embankments while the weather is calm (chapter 25).
Where they differ
Fighting. Sun Tzu's ideal is to avoid battle.
“Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.”
Machiavelli is more willing to fight and talks about cruelty openly. In chapter 8 he discusses cruelty that is used well, in his sense: done all at once for security and then stopped. In chapter 17 he concludes that if a prince cannot be both loved and feared, “it is much safer to be feared than loved” (tr. W. K. Marriott), while warning that he must never become hated.
Audience. Sun Tzu writes for the professional commander and spends many pages on terrain, supplies, fire attacks and the morale of troops. Machiavelli writes for a ruler and spends his pages on conquered provinces, advisers, flatterers, reputation and religion.
Politics. The Art of War says almost nothing about kinds of government. Machiavelli's Discourses on Livy argue that republics are more stable than principalities and that the people judge better than a prince in many things. Reading only The Prince gives a one-sided picture of him.
Armies. Machiavelli, who organised a Florentine citizen militia in 1506, is obsessed with the danger of hiring mercenaries (chapters 12 and 13). Sun Tzu assumes a ruler's conscripted army and focuses on discipline: the story in Sima Qian's biography, in which he executes two of the king's favourite concubines to make palace women obey drill orders, is an anecdote and may well be legend.
Famous quotes neither of them wrote
- “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer” is in neither book. It is a line from the film The Godfather Part II (1974).
- “The ends justify the means” is not a sentence in The Prince. The nearest passage, in chapter 18, says that people judge a prince's actions by the outcome.
- Many “Sun Tzu quotes” on business posters are modern paraphrases. If a line is not in the thirteen chapters, it is not his. Search a translation such as Giles's, which is free online.
For the method, see how to check if a quote is real.
Questions to ask Sun Tzu and Machiavelli
- Sun Tzu: what does it actually mean to win without fighting? Give an example.
- Sun Tzu: did the story of the palace women and the drill really happen?
- Sun Tzu: how much of the book is yours, and how much did later strategists add?
- Sun Tzu: why is a long war never good for a state?
- Machiavelli: did you mean The Prince seriously, or was it a job application to the Medici?
- Machiavelli: how do you square The Prince with your praise of republics in the Discourses?
- Machiavelli: what did you learn from watching Cesare Borgia in 1502?
- Both: is deception in politics different from deception in war?
Yuga lets you put these questions by voice to Sun Tzu and Machiavelli. Both are AI recreations built from their texts and the historical record; Sun Tzu's recreation is based on a traditional attribution, since so little is known of the man. They can be wrong. Quote the books by chapter in your work, not the app.
Which one for your project?
Choose Sun Tzu for a project on strategy, ancient China, or how an old text gets reused in business and sport. The book is short enough to read in an evening.
Choose Machiavelli for a project on Renaissance Italy, political realism, or the gap between a writer's reputation and his actual books. Read The Prince chapters 15 to 18 and his letter to Francesco Vettori of 10 December 1513.
Choose both for a debate about whether leaders may lie. For a third voice from ancient India, read Chanakya vs Machiavelli.
Questions people ask
- What is the difference between The Art of War and The Prince?
- The Art of War is an ancient Chinese manual for generals about winning wars through planning, knowledge and deception, ideally without battle. The Prince, written in 1513, advises a ruler on how to gain, keep and strengthen power. One is mostly military; the other is mostly political.
- Did Machiavelli read Sun Tzu?
- No. The Art of War first reached Europe in a French translation in 1772, long after Machiavelli died in 1527. The similarities come from both writers thinking realistically about conflict.
- Did Machiavelli also write a book called The Art of War?
- Yes. Machiavelli's Art of War (Dell'arte della guerra), published in 1521, is a dialogue about military organisation and citizen militias. It has nothing to do with Sun Tzu's book apart from the title.
- Did Sun Tzu really exist?
- Possibly. The only early biography was written by Sima Qian around 91 BCE, centuries later. Many scholars think The Art of War was compiled in the Warring States period, after the traditional dates. The text itself is real and was circulating by the 2nd century BCE.
- Who said keep your friends close and your enemies closer?
- Neither Sun Tzu nor Machiavelli. The line is spoken in the 1974 film The Godfather Part II. It does not appear in The Art of War or The Prince.
Sources
- Sun Tzu, The Art of War, tr. Lionel Giles, 1910 (Project Gutenberg)
- Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince, tr. W. K. Marriott (Project Gutenberg)
- Niccolò Machiavelli, Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius (Project Gutenberg)
- Sima Qian, Records of the Grand Historian (Shiji), chapter 65
- Roger T. Ames, Sun-tzu: The Art of Warfare (1993); Quentin Skinner, Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction (1981)